• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
global construction
dispute avoidance
and resolution
  • Dispute Avoidance
    • Dispute Boards
    • Negotiation
    • Conflict Avoidance
    • Conciliation
  • Dispute Expertise
    • Architect Expert Witness & Litigation Support
    • Forensic Investigation
    • Technical Audits & Advisory Reviews
  • Dispute Resolution
    • International and Domestic Arbitration
    • Adjudication
    • Mediation
    • Dispute Boards
    • Expert Determination
  • About
  • Team
    • Murray Armes
    • Jim Armstrong
    • Jason Bagge
    • David Cheah
    • Michael Clift
    • Matt Cousins
    • Antony Davis
    • Orla Fitz.Gerald
    • Murray Fordham
    • Stuart Hill
    • Joan Kennedy
    • Andrew Paul
    • Mark Phillips
    • Magdalena Prus
    • Jon Satow
    • Philip Veall
  • Insights
  • Contact

The Sun in a Box – The ITER Dispute Board

by Murray Armes

The Structure of Dispute Boards

A dispute board is a tribunal of experts that is independent, impartial, proactive and judicial. The real success of DBs is the way they can proactively assist the parties in avoiding disputes, saving the time and cost of arbitration or litigation and allowing the project to proceed in a collaborative manner. The standing DB, which is appointed at the commencement of the contract, does that by carrying out regular site visits and holding meetings to enable difficulties to be discussed or by proactively making enquiries if the parties are reluctant to discuss them. The board may help in finding solutions and if that cannot be done may, if the procedural rules permit, and both parties agree, give a non-binding recommendation to guide the parties to a solution. If still unresolved the matter can be formally referred to the DB for a decision under the contract.

Most procedural rules provide for a DB of one, three, or an odd number of larger members. An odd number is important to prevent split decisions. Single member boards are frequently used for smaller projects (and some very large ones) because they are more economical. In the case of the three member board, the procedure is normally that one party will select a member, the other party will do the same and the two members will nominate the chairperson2. Although a three person board is more expensive, the advantage is the greater diversity and expertise of the board…

Articles

Good Record Keeping or Consensus Ad Idem?
by Andrew Paul
Read more
Understanding Mediation: Two sides to every story
by Murray Armes
Read more
The Concept of Dispute Avoidance
by Murray Armes
Read more
Counting The Cost
by Murray Armes
Read more
Practical Completion: a contextual art?
by Andrew Paul
Read more
Everybody Has Won and All Must Have Prizes
by Murray Armes
Read more
Putting Your Money Where Your Mouth Is
by Murray Armes
Read more
The Challenge of Culture Change
by Matt Cousins
Read more
By Act or Omission: a contractual obligation
by Andrew Paul
Read more

Footer

Services:

  • Architect Expert Witness
  • International & Domestic Arbitration
  • Dispute Boards
  • Adjudication
  • Mediation
  • Forensic Investigation

Explore:

  • Our approach
  • Articles
  • Memberships & Affiliations

Legal:

  • Privacy Policy
  • Complaints Procedure

Contact:

3rd Floor, Aldwych House,
71-91 Aldwych,
London, WC2B 4HN
United Kingdom

Enquiries:

sense@sensestudio.co.uk
+44(0)20 7438 1550

Copyright © 2022 Sense Studio Limited, Company Registration No. 08121493