• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
  • Skip to footer
global construction
dispute avoidance
and resolution
  • Dispute Avoidance
    • Dispute Boards
    • Negotiation
    • Conflict Avoidance
    • Conciliation
  • Dispute Expertise
    • Architect Expert Witness & Litigation Support
    • Forensic Investigation
    • Technical Audits & Advisory Reviews
  • Dispute Resolution
    • International and Domestic Arbitration
    • Adjudication
    • Mediation
    • Dispute Boards
    • Expert Determination
  • About
  • Team
    • Murray Armes
    • Jim Armstrong
    • Jason Bagge
    • David Cheah
    • Michael Clift
    • Matt Cousins
    • Antony Davis
    • Orla Fitz.Gerald
    • Murray Fordham
    • Stuart Hill
    • Joan Kennedy
    • Andrew Paul
    • Mark Phillips
    • Magdalena Prus
    • Jon Satow
    • Philip Veall
  • Insights
  • Contact

By Act or Omission:
a contractual obligation

by Andrew Paul

‘We’re extending!…you’re an Architect, you’ll do a few doodles for us won’t you?’. It’s the question many architects are asked by friends and the same question many dread, and for good reason. The closely followed Burgess v Lejonvarn trilogy recently culminated in a decision from the Technology and Construction Court1 which will no doubt spark caution in any one undertaking gratuitous work for friends or family.

The Burgesses and Mrs Lejonvarn were friends and former neighbours. Lejonvarn had provided architectural services to Mr Burgess’ firm through her previous employer and her own practice. The Burgesses had ambitious plans for their steeply sloped garden in Highgate and a landscape designer prepared a design which was costed around £150k. This was too high for the Burgesses and architect/project manager-friend Lejonvarn thought it could be done for less. She offered to help them deliver the project intending only to charge a fee for designing the finishes. She however went on to be involved in the preceding groundworks package (without formal payment) until the point there was a fundamental disagreement about the project budget. The parties fell out and parted ways. At the point Mrs Lejonvarn ceased to be involved, the works were behind schedule, costs overrunning and there were issues with quality. The Burgesses went on to claim against Mrs Lejonvarn for the alleged losses in her capacity as architect and project manager…

Articles

Good Record Keeping or Consensus Ad Idem?
by Andrew Paul
Read more
Understanding Mediation: Two sides to every story
by Murray Armes
Read more
The Concept of Dispute Avoidance
by Murray Armes
Read more
Counting The Cost
by Murray Armes
Read more
Practical Completion: a contextual art?
by Andrew Paul
Read more
Everybody Has Won and All Must Have Prizes
by Murray Armes
Read more
Putting Your Money Where Your Mouth Is
by Murray Armes
Read more
The Challenge of Culture Change
by Matt Cousins
Read more
The Expert Witness in Adjudication
by Murray Armes
Read more

Footer

Services:

  • Architect Expert Witness
  • International & Domestic Arbitration
  • Dispute Boards
  • Adjudication
  • Mediation
  • Forensic Investigation

Explore:

  • Our approach
  • Articles
  • Memberships & Affiliations

Legal:

  • Privacy Policy
  • Complaints Procedure

Contact:

3rd Floor, Aldwych House,
71-91 Aldwych,
London, WC2B 4HN
United Kingdom

Enquiries:

sense@sensestudio.co.uk
+44(0)20 7438 1550

Copyright © 2022 Sense Studio Limited, Company Registration No. 08121493